“All Campaign Hacks”
From Dan Gerstein at Forbes, "All Campaign Hacks:" ...the Obama White House's biggest weakness: The president's top advisers are not just overly political, they are almost totally political. Indeed, this West Wing is stacked with "hacks"--campaign professionals who are acculturated to think, act and win in the hothouse environments of elections, not to govern a bitterly divided country in extremely difficult times.
The whole article is very good, esp. as it does something I wish the right-wing blogosphere would do more of: offer criteria for what would make better governance. One problem with going to conspiracy theory to attack the White House is that if the White House does something right, it can't be given any credit. As of this writing, it is hoped President Obama will do the right thing regarding Afghanistan - there is an example of stunning success in governance and accountability there, though not widespread. It is also hoped he will stop pandering to the most rabid portions of the Leftist base and stop making cap-and-trade and health care reform a priority, and instead do his job and keep us safe; show trials of terrorists captured during the Bush administration are PR gimmicks, not serious policy. I can't conceive of him lowering taxes or cutting spending, but it would be nice to see him back away from spending that dwarfs the Bush years. I know that last wish is actually realistic, far more realistic than you would expect given the ranting right and left that occurs nowadays. All that has to happen is for the President to realize that his fellow Democrats in Congress are a bunch of losers, and stop giving them blanket support for pork. A quick look at how they handled the tea parties, the health care debate and these past elections goes a long way to proving that.
Off-topic: from my blog - Does Power Corrupt?
Do states that have higher taxes provide better services?
"The Big-Spending, High-Taxing, Lousy-Services Paradigm," William Vogeli - re: California, from the article: Take entitlements and public-employee pensions, which are, Watkins says, “the real source of the state’s fiscal distress.” A 2005 study by the Legislative Analyst’s Office (California’s version of the Congressional Budget Office) found that pensions for California’s government employees “surpassed the other states—often significantly—at all retirement ages.” California government workers retiring at age 55 received larger pensions than their counterparts in any other state (leaving aside the many states where retirement as early as 55 isn’t even possible). The California Foundation for Fiscal Responsibility periodically posts a list of retired city managers, state administrators, public university deans, and police chiefs who receive pensions of at least $100,000 per year. The latest report shows 5,115 lucky members in this six-figure club. The state’s annual bill for polishing their gold watches is $610 million.
The article above seems to contend that they just find newer ways of wasting money: it's not a terribly long read, and most of you are familiar with the argument, but the numbers are still shocking.
Off-topic: William Blake, "The Tyger" - one of the reasons I started writing on poetry is that political news tends to be the same thing, over and over again. California's budget crisis has been documented for years upon years now.



